Best 100ms Alternatives ranked by AI · updated Aug 2026

100ms is a real-time video and audio platform for meetings, classrooms, live events, and interactive broadcasts. Its SDKs provide room templates, roles, layouts, recording, and streaming controls for developers and product teams.

Developer: 100ms Price: Free tier; usage-based pricing after included minutes 🎯 100ms.live

Top 6 100ms alternatives

A developer platform for embedding interactive live broadcasts, real-time video, audio, and audience participation into web and mobile applications. It supports host-and-audience...

Pros

  • Strong support for large interactive broadcasts with host, co-host, and audience roles
  • Broad SDK coverage across web, iOS, Android, game engines, and native platforms
  • Lower-latency audience interaction than traditional broadcast streaming services

Cons

  • Usage-based pricing can be harder to forecast than fixed SaaS plans
  • Requires substantially more engineering than turnkey livestreaming tools
  • Advanced production workflows and moderation usually need custom implementation

Freemium, usage-based after 10,000 minutes/month

5 ZEGOCLOUD logo

ZEGOCLOUD

ZEGOCLOUD

ZEGOCLOUD is a communications platform providing SDKs and APIs for video calling, live streaming, real-time chat, and interactive audio. It targets developers...

Pros

  • Combines video calls, live streaming, chat, and engagement features in one SDK suite
  • Supports web, iOS, Android, Flutter, React Native, and other platforms
  • Offers prebuilt UI kits that can reduce implementation time

Cons

  • Smaller ecosystem and community than Twilio or Agora
  • Documentation and SDK behavior can vary across platforms
  • Advanced workflows may require more vendor-specific integration

Free tier; usage-based pricing after included minutes

6

LiveKit

LiveKit

LiveKit is an open-source real-time communications platform built around WebRTC, with an SFU, client SDKs, and server APIs. It is designed for...

Pros

  • Offers more control and scalability than using browser WebRTC APIs alone
  • Can be self-hosted or deployed through LiveKit Cloud
  • Supports modern web, mobile, backend, and server-side workflows

Cons

  • Self-hosting requires media-server and networking expertise
  • Higher operational complexity than fully managed APIs
  • Some cloud features and support require paid usage

Open source; managed cloud usage-based pricing

How good are these alternatives?

Your feedback helps us improve the AI rankings.

βœ… Thanks for your feedback!

Know a better alternative? πŸ™Œ

Suggest a product and our AI will verify it's a real alternative to 100ms before adding it to the list.

People also compare