Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) is an object storage service that offers industry-leading scalability, data availability, security, and performance.
Pay as you go pricing based on usage
Best Appwrite Storage Alternatives ranked by AI · updated Aug 2026
✅ Update queued — the AI is re-ranking this list. The page will refresh shortly.
This page is already up to date.
Appwrite Storage is a file storage service within Appwrite's backend platform for web, mobile, and server applications. It provides buckets, permissions, previews, transformations, and SDKs alongside Appwrite authentication and databases.
Developer: Appwrite
Price: Free self-hosted; cloud free tier, Pro from $25/mo
🎯 appwrite.io/products/storage
Top 6 Appwrite Storage alternatives
Minio is an open-source, high-performance object storage solution that is compatible with Amazon S3.
Supabase Storage is an object storage service for applications that need to upload, serve, and manage files with access policies. It integrates...
Pros
- Integrates directly with Supabase Auth, database metadata, and row-level security
- Provides browser-friendly uploads, transformations, caching, and signed URLs
- Simpler application setup than configuring a standalone object storage provider
Cons
- Less globally configurable than Amazon S3 for complex enterprise architectures
- Storage and bandwidth limits depend on the broader Supabase plan
- Advanced media processing is less extensive than Cloudinary
Free tier; Pro from $25/mo
4
Cloudflare R2
Cloudflare
Cloudflare R2 is an S3-compatible object storage service for web assets, application data, backups, and AI or analytics workloads. It is aimed...
Pros
- No egress fees are advantageous for frequently accessed data
- S3-compatible API eases migration from IONOS and other providers
- Integrates with Cloudflare Workers, CDN, and event-driven services
Cons
- Storage price is higher than IONOS's base rate
- Not all advanced S3 behaviors and storage classes are available
- Cloudflare-specific workflows can increase platform dependence
From $0.015/GB-month; free egress
5
Google
Firebase Storage
Firebase Storage provides managed file storage for mobile and web applications using Google Cloud Storage infrastructure. It is designed for Firebase developers...
Pros
- Tightly integrates with Firebase Authentication and security rules
- Strong Android, iOS, and web SDK support for application uploads
- Uses Google Cloud Storage durability and infrastructure
Cons
- Less natural fit for applications built around Postgres than Supabase Storage
- Security rules require learning Firebase-specific syntax and behavior
- Pricing becomes usage-based on the Blaze plan
No-cost quota; pay-as-you-go with Blaze plan
6
Backblaze B2
Backblaze
Backblaze B2 is low-cost cloud object storage for backups, media, archives, and application files. It serves developers and businesses seeking S3-compatible storage...
Pros
- Lower storage pricing than Supabase Storage and many general-purpose clouds
- Offers S3-compatible APIs and native Backblaze APIs
- Straightforward fit for backups, archives, and large media libraries
Cons
- Fewer built-in authentication and database integrations than Supabase Storage
- Application upload policies and metadata workflows need separate implementation
- Global edge delivery requires a CDN or partner integration
From $0.006/GB-month
How good are these alternatives?
Your feedback helps us improve the AI rankings.
✅ Thanks for your feedback!
Know a better alternative? 🙌
Suggest a product and our AI will verify it's a real alternative to Appwrite Storage before adding it to the list.