AWS Server Migration Service logo

Best AWS Server Migration Service Alternatives ranked by AI · updated Aug 2026

βœ… Update queued β€” the AI is re-ranking this list. The page will refresh shortly.

This page is already up to date.

AWS Server Migration Service was a legacy AWS service for replicating on-premises servers and virtual machines into Amazon Machine Images for migration to Amazon EC2. It is no longer available to new customers, with AWS Application Migration Service serving as the recommended replacement.

Developer: Amazon Web Services Price: N/A (no longer available to new customers) 🎯 aws.amazon.com/application-migration-service

Top 6 AWS Server Migration Service alternatives

1

AWS Application Migration Service

Amazon Web Services

πŸ’‘ Pick it for AWS's current replacement with continuous replication and controlled cutovers.

AWS Application Migration Service continuously replicates physical, virtual, and cloud servers into AWS and supports test and cutover workflows. It is designed...

Pros

  • AWS's current successor with broader source-server support than AWS Server Migration Service
  • Continuous block-level replication enables short cutover windows
  • Supports non-disruptive testing before migration

Cons

  • Primarily targets migrations into AWS rather than multi-cloud portability
  • Requires installing an agent on most source servers
  • AWS networking, storage, and compute charges can complicate total-cost estimates

Free for 90 days per server; AWS infrastructure charges apply

2

Azure Migrate

Microsoft

πŸ’‘ Pick it when you need discovery, right-sizing, and migration planning centered on Microsoft Azure.

Azure Migrate provides discovery, assessment, and migration tools for servers, databases, applications, and virtual desktops moving to Microsoft Azure. It is aimed...

Pros

  • Combines inventory, right-sizing, dependency analysis, and migration planning
  • Supports VMware, Hyper-V, physical servers, and some AWS or GCP workloads
  • Strong integration with Azure cost estimates, security, and governance

Cons

  • Best experience is tied to Azure rather than a neutral multi-cloud target
  • The portal can be more complex than a focused replication tool
  • Some workload types require separate Azure migration services

Free for discovery and assessment; Azure migration infrastructure costs extra

πŸ’‘ Pick it when migrating VMware or physical workloads into Google Compute Engine with minimal replatforming.

Migrate to Virtual Machines moves workloads from VMware, physical servers, AWS, and other environments into Google Compute Engine. It provides continuous replication,...

Pros

  • Supports migrations from VMware, physical servers, and other public clouds
  • Continuous replication allows testing without stopping production workloads
  • Destination VMs can use Google Cloud networking, disks, and security controls

Cons

  • Primarily designed for Google Cloud destinations
  • Coverage for specialized operating systems and appliances varies
  • Requires planning around Google Cloud networking and IAM

No additional charge for the migration service; Google Cloud destination resources are billed

4

VMware HCX

Broadcom

πŸ’‘ Pick it for low-downtime migration between on-premises vSphere and VMware-based clouds.

VMware HCX provides bulk migration, live migration, and network extension between compatible VMware environments. It is designed for enterprises moving or balancing...

Pros

  • Live vMotion and bulk migration can minimize application downtime
  • Extends compatible VMware networks to reduce migration-related reconfiguration
  • Strong fit for vSphere-to-vSphere and hybrid VMware estates

Cons

  • Requires compatible VMware infrastructure at both ends
  • Less useful for physical servers or non-VMware workloads than AWS MGN
  • Licensing and Broadcom subscription requirements can be difficult to navigate

Included with eligible VMware Cloud subscriptions; otherwise quote-based

5 Zerto logo

πŸ’‘ Pick it when migration must also provide orchestrated disaster recovery and point-in-time rollback.

Zerto is a data protection and disaster recovery software that provides continuous data protection and disaster recovery for virtualized infrastructure and cloud...

6

πŸ’‘ Pick it for heterogeneous physical, virtual, and cloud migrations where multi-platform flexibility matters.

Carbonite Migrate replicates and moves physical, virtual, and cloud servers between supported environments with configurable cutover workflows. It is intended for IT...

Pros

  • Supports physical, virtual, and cloud server migration in one product
  • Can migrate between unlike environments rather than only within one cloud
  • Continuous replication helps reduce downtime during final cutover

Cons

  • Pricing is less transparent than native cloud migration services
  • Requires agent deployment and compatibility checking on source systems
  • User experience is less integrated with a specific cloud platform

How good are these alternatives?

Your feedback helps us improve the AI rankings.

βœ… Thanks for your feedback!

Know a better alternative? πŸ™Œ

Suggest a product and our AI will verify it's a real alternative to AWS Server Migration Service before adding it to the list.

People also compare