Best Electric UI Alternatives ranked by AI · updated Aug 2026

Electric UI is a development framework for building desktop interfaces that communicate with embedded hardware. It is aimed at embedded developers who need interactive controls, telemetry displays, and rapid UI iteration without implementing a complete graphics stack on the device.

Developer: Electric UI Price: N/A 🎯 electricui.com

🛠️ Developer Tools 📊 Data Visualization embedded ui hardware interfaces

Top 6 Electric UI alternatives

Qt for MCUs

The Qt Company

💡 Pick it when you need a polished, on-device embedded product UI backed by mature commercial tooling.

Qt for MCUs is a lightweight embedded GUI framework for creating on-device interfaces on microcontrollers. It targets product teams that want Qt...

Pros

Provides a mature design and development workflow for embedded products
Supports on-device interfaces rather than requiring a host computer
Offers stronger tooling and documentation than Electric UI

Cons

Commercial licensing is more complex than LVGL or other open-source options
Requires more embedded graphics planning than a host-side Electric UI workflow
Hardware and memory requirements can vary by feature set

Commercial; free evaluation available

Alternatives to Qt for MCUs → Visit site

LVGL

💡 Pick it for a free, flexible on-device GUI library that runs directly on resource-constrained microcontrollers.

LVGL is an open-source graphics library for embedded systems, especially microcontrollers and small displays. It provides widgets, layouts, input handling, and rendering...

Pros

Free and permissively licensed for commercial embedded products
Runs on a broad range of microcontrollers and display hardware
Has a large community and extensive widget set

Cons

More firmware and hardware integration work than Electric UI
Visual design workflows are less integrated than Qt or TouchGFX
Requires careful performance tuning on constrained targets

Free, open source under the MIT license

Alternatives to LVGL → Visit site

Slint

💡 Pick it when you want a modern declarative UI shared between embedded targets and desktop development.

Slint is a declarative UI toolkit for embedded devices and desktop applications, with Rust, C++, and JavaScript integration. It is designed for...

Pros

Declarative UI syntax is more modern than many traditional embedded toolkits
Supports both embedded targets and desktop development
Rust, C++, and JavaScript support broadens implementation choices

Cons

Smaller ecosystem and hardware track record than Qt or LVGL
Commercial licensing may be required for closed-source products
Embedded rendering still requires target-specific integration

Free for open-source projects; commercial licensing available

Alternatives to Slint → Visit site

TouchGFX

STMicroelectronics

💡 Pick it when your product uses STM32 and needs a visually designed touchscreen interface at no framework cost.

TouchGFX is an embedded GUI framework and visual development environment for STM32 microcontrollers. It is intended for teams creating touch-enabled displays with...

Pros

Strong integration with STM32 hardware and development tools
Includes visual screen design and code-generation workflows
Optimized for responsive graphics on supported STM32 devices

Cons

Limited to the STM32 ecosystem compared with Electric UI
Less useful for host-based engineering dashboards
Visual workflow can tie projects closely to generated code

Free for STM32 microcontrollers

Alternatives to TouchGFX → Visit site

Embedded Wizard

TARA Systems

💡 Pick it for a commercial, polished on-device UI requiring visual tooling and vendor support across embedded platforms.

Embedded Wizard is a commercial GUI technology for creating high-performance interfaces on embedded devices. It targets product teams that need visual design...