๐Ÿ”Ž
ailternative

Best etherwake Alternatives ranked by AI · updated Aug 2026

โœ… Update queued โ€” the AI is re-ranking this list. The page will refresh shortly.

This page is already up to date.

etherwake is a small Linux command-line utility that sends Wake-on-LAN magic packets from a network interface. It is intended for administrators and scripting users who prefer a minimal tool over gWakeOnLan's graphical interface.

Developer: Linux contributors Price: Free, open source ๐ŸŽฏ github.com/jmesmon/etherwake

Top 6 etherwake alternatives

2

gWakeOnLan

gWakeOnLan contributors

gWakeOnLan is a Linux GTK utility for waking computers over a local network using Wake-on-LAN magic packets. It is aimed at desktop...

Pros

  • Graphical interface is simpler than command-line Wake-on-LAN tools
  • Designed specifically for Linux desktops
  • Supports saved device profiles with MAC addresses

Cons

  • Less actively maintained than several command-line alternatives
  • Linux-focused, with no official Windows or macOS version
  • Fewer network discovery and scheduling features than commercial tools

EMCO WakeOnLan is a professional tool that allows you to wake up multiple PCs across a network.

Pros

  • Advanced features
  • Supports Wake On LAN across subnets

Cons

  • Paid plans can be expensive for some users
  • Complex setup for beginners

Free version available, Paid plans start at $179

5

wakeonlan

Josรฉ Luis Lรกzaro

wakeonlan is a Perl command-line utility for sending Wake-on-LAN packets to one or more computers. It is aimed at Linux, Unix, and...

Pros

  • Supports multiple target machines in one command
  • Works well in scripts and scheduled jobs
  • Uses simple configuration files for reusable device lists

Cons

  • No graphical interface or network discovery
  • Requires Perl and command-line familiarity
  • Less suitable for interactive desktop use than gWakeOnLan
6

wol

Free Software Foundation contributors

wol is a GNU/Linux command-line tool for waking computers with Wake-on-LAN and related magic-packet methods. It is designed for technically oriented users...

Pros

  • Supports reusable configuration for multiple hosts
  • Suitable for shell scripts and server automation
  • Provides more protocol options than many basic GUI tools

Cons

  • Less beginner-friendly than gWakeOnLan's graphical workflow
  • Older command-line design feels less polished than newer utilities
  • No built-in graphical discovery or device monitoring

How good are these alternatives?

Your feedback helps us improve the AI rankings.

โœ… Thanks for your feedback!

Know a better alternative? ๐Ÿ™Œ

Suggest a product and our AI will verify it's a real alternative to etherwake before adding it to the list.