Best Evilginx Alternatives ranked by AI · updated Aug 2026

βœ… Update queued β€” the AI is re-ranking this list. The page will refresh shortly.

This page is already up to date.

Evilginx is an open-source man-in-the-middle framework for authorized phishing-resilience and credential-flow testing. It is intended for security professionals evaluating authentication controls, session protection, and user susceptibility, rather than Wi-Fi-specific defenses.

Developer: Evilginx Project Price: Free 🎯 github.com/kgretzky/evilginx2

Top 6 Evilginx alternatives

1 wifiphisher logo

wifiphisher

Wifiphisher Project

Wifiphisher is an open-source Wi-Fi security auditing framework for authorized assessments of client exposure to rogue access points and captive-portal phishing. It...

Pros

  • Focused workflow for authorized rogue-access-point and captive-portal assessments
  • Open-source and extensible with custom phishing scenarios
  • Supports common wireless assessment hardware and Linux environments

Cons

  • Requires compatible wireless adapters and substantial Linux networking knowledge
  • Less suited to broad wireless protocol auditing than Aircrack-ng
  • Use can disrupt nearby networks and requires explicit authorization
5 Muraena logo

Muraena

Muraena Team

Muraena is an open-source reverse-proxy framework for authorized phishing simulations and adversary-in-the-middle security testing. It is designed for penetration testers who need...

Pros

  • Automates reverse-proxy setup more extensively than many comparable tools
  • Supports testing of modern authentication and session-handling controls
  • Written in Go and deployable on common Linux systems

Cons

  • Requires substantial security and infrastructure expertise
  • Not designed as a turnkey employee-awareness training platform
  • Can be difficult to adapt when target applications change their authentication flows
6

Airgeddon

Airgeddon Project

Airgeddon is an interactive Bash-based framework for auditing wireless networks on Linux. It combines reconnaissance, handshake capture, WPA testing, and related wireless...

Pros

  • Offers more guided wireless-audit automation than command-line-only tools
  • Integrates several common capture and password-testing utilities
  • Supports broader wireless assessment scenarios than a dedicated WPA password auditor

Cons

  • Requires Linux, compatible wireless hardware, and multiple dependencies
  • Less suitable for controlled high-throughput password recovery than Hashcat
  • Menu-driven automation provides less precision than assembling a custom toolchain

How good are these alternatives?

Your feedback helps us improve the AI rankings.

βœ… Thanks for your feedback!

Know a better alternative? πŸ™Œ

Suggest a product and our AI will verify it's a real alternative to Evilginx before adding it to the list.

People also compare