Best FocusVision LiveVideo Alternatives ranked by AI · updated Aug 2026

✅ Update queued — the AI is re-ranking this list. The page will refresh shortly.

This page is already up to date.

FocusVision LiveVideo was a browser-based platform for conducting live online focus groups, interviews, and other qualitative research sessions. It supported moderated video, participant and observer access, screen sharing, chat, recording, and research-team collaboration.

Developer: FocusVision Price: Custom pricing 🎯 focusvision.com

📊 Market Research qualitative research video research focus groups

Top 6 FocusVision LiveVideo alternatives

Discuss

Discuss.io

💡 Pick it for a newer end-to-end qualitative research workflow with transcription and AI-assisted analysis.

Discuss is a qualitative research platform for live and asynchronous interviews, focus groups, and customer conversations. It combines moderated video sessions with...

Pros

Broader end-to-end qualitative workflow than FocusVision LiveVideo
Supports live video, asynchronous activities, transcription, and analysis
Strong fit for distributed global research teams

Cons

Typically more expensive than standalone video-conferencing software
Greater platform complexity for simple one-off interviews
Advanced features generally require a sales-assisted plan

Custom pricing

Alternatives to Discuss → Visit site

Recollective

💡 Choose it when research extends beyond a live session into diaries, communities, or multi-day participant activities.

Recollective is an online qualitative research platform for communities, diaries, discussions, surveys, and live video sessions. It is built for researchers who...

Pros

Combines live sessions with communities, diaries, and asynchronous discussions
Better suited than LiveVideo for multi-day or longitudinal studies
Includes participant activity management and multimedia responses

Cons

Broader research-community features can add setup overhead
Live video is not its only or primary use case
Custom pricing makes small-study budgeting less predictable

Custom pricing

Alternatives to Recollective → Visit site

dscout

💡 Pick it for mobile diary studies and in-context video feedback rather than conventional online focus groups.

dscout is a research platform that helps businesses conduct remote research studies with real people. It offers video-based insights and analysis tools.

Pros

Remote research capabilities
Video-based insights

Cons

Can be costly for large projects

Custom pricing

Alternatives to dscout →

UserZoom

💡 Choose it when live interviews need to sit alongside usability testing and broader UX research.

UserZoom is a user research and usability testing platform that helps businesses improve their digital experiences.

Contact for pricing

Alternatives to UserZoom → Visit site

itracks

💡 Pick it for research-services support and a broad mix of live and asynchronous qualitative methods.

itracks provides software and services for online qualitative research, including live focus groups, interviews, communities, and asynchronous activities. Its platform is designed...

Pros

Directly targets online qualitative research and focus-group use cases
Supports both synchronous and asynchronous research formats
Research-services support can help with complex studies

Cons

Less self-serve than mainstream conferencing products
Interface and feature breadth may feel dated compared with newer platforms
Pricing and implementation generally require contacting sales

Custom pricing

Alternatives to itracks → Visit site

QualBoard

Itracks

💡 Choose it when asynchronous boards and multi-day discussions matter more than live video sessions.

QualBoard is an online qualitative research platform for moderated bulletin boards, discussions, diaries, and participant activities. It is designed for researchers conducting...