Best ISS Governance Alternatives ranked by AI · updated Aug 2026

ISS Governance provides proxy voting, governance research, and voting-policy tools for institutional investors and corporations. Its services combine ballot execution with issuer analysis, recommendations, and vote reporting.

Developer: Institutional Shareholder Services Price: N/A 🎯 issgovernance.com

Top 6 ISS Governance alternatives

2 Shareholder Vote Exchange logo

Shareholder Vote Exchange

Shareholder Vote Exchange

Shareholder Vote Exchange is an online marketplace intended to connect shareholders and investors around proxy voting rights. It is designed for participants...

Pros

  • Targets shareholder voting rights rather than only administrative ballot collection
  • Can help participants coordinate voting influence across corporate actions
  • More specialized for activist and strategic investors than general voting software

Cons

  • Narrower market and less established infrastructure than major proxy-service providers
  • Regulatory and disclosure requirements can complicate vote transfers
  • Public pricing, coverage, and supported markets are limited
3

Broadridge ProxyEdge

Broadridge Financial Solutions

Broadridge ProxyEdge is an institutional proxy voting and governance platform for asset managers, banks, and institutional investors. It supports ballot processing, vote...

Pros

  • Much broader institutional coverage and operational scale
  • Stronger integration with custodians and investment-management systems
  • More mature reporting and audit controls

Cons

  • Less focused on exchanging or marketplace-style coordination of voting rights
  • Enterprise procurement is more complex than a specialized web service
  • Pricing is not publicly disclosed
4

Proxymity

Proxymity

Proxymity provides digital proxy voting infrastructure connecting issuers, intermediaries, custodians, and investors. Its platform focuses on end-to-end vote communication, confirmation, and transparency...

Pros

  • Provides stronger end-to-end vote traceability than a standalone exchange
  • Designed for issuers and financial intermediaries as well as investors
  • Reduces manual handling of proxy instructions

Cons

  • Not a public marketplace for buying or selling voting rights
  • Availability depends on intermediary and market participation
  • Enterprise implementation can require coordination across several parties
5

Glass Lewis

Glass Lewis

Glass Lewis provides proxy voting research, recommendations, and voting-policy tools for institutional investors. Its Viewpoint platform helps clients review ballots, apply policies,...

Pros

  • Strong independent proxy research and governance analysis
  • Useful policy-based voting workflows for asset managers
  • Well established among institutional investors

Cons

  • Does not function as a marketplace for exchanging shareholder votes
  • Research subscriptions can be expensive
  • Coverage and recommendations are oriented toward institutional workflows
6

Computershare

Computershare

Computershare provides shareholder registry, investor-relations, meeting, and proxy-voting services for public companies and their investors. Its meeting technology supports shareholder communications, electronic...

Pros

  • Broad issuer-side capabilities beyond proxy voting
  • Handles registry, meeting, and corporate-action workflows together
  • Global operating footprint and compliance experience

Cons

  • Not designed for peer-to-peer exchange of voting rights
  • More service-heavy and less self-directed than a web marketplace
  • Implementation is aimed mainly at issuers and intermediaries

How good are these alternatives?

Your feedback helps us improve the AI rankings.

βœ… Thanks for your feedback!

Know a better alternative? πŸ™Œ

Suggest a product and our AI will verify it's a real alternative to ISS Governance before adding it to the list.