Best Microsoft Entra Private Access Alternatives ranked by AI · updated Aug 2026

✅ Update queued — the AI is re-ranking this list. The page will refresh shortly.

This page is already up to date.

Microsoft Entra Private Access provides identity-based access to private applications and network resources through the Entra security platform. It is designed for Microsoft-centric organizations replacing broad VPN access with application-level policies.

Developer: Microsoft Price: From $5/user/month 🎯 microsoft.com/en-us/security/business/identity-access/microsoft-entra-private-access

Cloud Security Zero-Trust access management identity proxy vpn replacement

Top 6 Microsoft Entra Private Access alternatives

Tailscale

Tailscale Inc.

Tailscale is a managed mesh VPN built on WireGuard for connecting devices, users, and services across private networks. It targets teams, developers,...

Pros

Much easier to deploy and operate than Headscale
Broader support for ACLs, device posture, subnet routers, and identity providers
Reliable managed control plane with polished clients

Cons

Paid team features cost more than self-hosted Headscale
Requires trusting Tailscale with control-plane metadata
Less suitable when fully independent infrastructure is mandatory

Free for personal use; paid plans from $6/user/mo

Alternatives to Tailscale → Visit site

Citrix Gateway

Citrix Systems

Citrix Gateway provides secure remote access to virtual applications, desktops, and internal web resources for enterprise users. It combines SSL VPN capabilities...

Pros

Deep integration with Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops
Supports application-level access instead of exposing entire networks
Mature authentication, policy, and session-control features

Cons

Best value depends on an existing Citrix deployment
More complex to administer than cloud-native access products
Licensing and support costs are not publicly transparent

N/A

Alternatives to Citrix Gateway → Visit site

Identity-Aware Proxy

Google

Identity-Aware Proxy is a Google Cloud service that controls access to applications and virtual machines using user identity and context instead of...

Pros

Integrates directly with Google Cloud load balancers, App Engine, Compute Engine, and GKE
Uses Google identities and context-aware access policies without requiring a traditional VPN
Provides centralized authentication and authorization for web applications

Cons

Best suited to Google Cloud workloads compared with platform-neutral alternatives
Requires Google Cloud configuration and IAM expertise
Application support is narrower than full network-access products such as Tailscale

No additional charge; Google Cloud usage charges apply

Alternatives to Identity-Aware Pro... → Visit site