Best Alternatives for PacketFence proposed by Free AI models

PacketFence

PacketFence

Website: 🎯 packetfence.org

PacketFence is a fully supported, trusted, Free and Open Source network access control (NAC) solution. Boasting an impressive feature set including a captive-portal for registration and remediation, centralized wired, and wireless management, 802.1X support, layer-2 isolation of problematic devices, integration with the Snort IDS and the Nessus vulnerability scanner; PacketFence can be used to effectively secure small to very large heterogeneous networks.

Price: Free

Best Alternatives for PacketFence proposed by Free AI models

Aruba ClearPass is a leading network access control and policy management solution that provides secure...

Price: Contact sales for pricing

Pros:

Cons:

Monitoring Tools Identity And Access Management Identity Provider SSO

OpenNAC is an open-source Network Access Control for corporate LAN/WAN environments. It employs 802.1X, MAC,...

Price: Free

Pros:

  • Open Source
  • Supports 802.1X

Cons:

  • Limited documentation

Portnox CLEAR is a cloud-based network access control solution. It provides real-time visibility and management...

Price: Contact for pricing

Pros:

  • Cloud-based
  • Real-time visibility

Cons:

  • Pricing may not be suitable for all organizations

Cisco ISE is a network access control policy platform that enforces security policies based on...

Price: Contact sales for pricing

Pros:

  • Integration with Cisco ecosystem
  • Scalability

Cons:

  • Complex configuration
  • High learning curve

Pulse Policy Secure is a network access control solution that provides visibility and control over...

Price: Contact sales for pricing

Pros:

  • User-friendly interface
  • Granular access control

Cons:

  • Limited integration options
  • Licensing model

ForeScout CounterACT is an agentless network access control solution that provides real-time visibility and control...

Price: Contact sales for pricing

Pros:

  • Agentless deployment
  • Extensive device coverage

Cons:

  • Complex deployment in large environments
  • Lack of advanced reporting