CrushFTP is a robust file transfer server that supports FTP, SFTP, SCP, WebDAV, and more with a focus on security and performance.
Starting at $700
Best SFTP To Go Alternatives ranked by AI · updated Aug 2026
✅ Update queued — the AI is re-ranking this list. The page will refresh shortly.
This page is already up to date.
SFTP To Go is a hosted SFTP, FTPS, and object-storage service for developers and businesses that need secure file exchange. It provides managed storage, user access controls, APIs, and integration with Amazon S3-compatible workflows.
Top 6 SFTP To Go alternatives
ExaVault is a secure file transfer service that allows businesses to share files and collaborate with ease.
Starting at $20/month
Couchdrop is a cloud-based managed file transfer service that provides SFTP, FTP, and file automation without requiring users to manage servers. It...
Pros
- Connects SFTP and FTP workflows directly to cloud storage
- Requires less server administration than self-hosted file-transfer software
- Supports automated file routing and scheduled transfers
Cons
- Fewer enterprise governance features than Files.com or AWS Transfer Family
- Less customizable than self-hosted SFTP servers
- Cloud-storage integrations can be plan-dependent
From $19/mo
SFTPGo is an open-source file-transfer server supporting SFTP, FTP, WebDAV, HTTP, and related storage back ends. It is aimed at teams that...
Pros
- Open-source edition avoids commercial license costs
- Supports SFTP, web access, and multiple storage back ends
- Can be deployed in a DMZ with standard reverse-proxy patterns
Cons
- Fewer enterprise governance and partner-management features than MFT Gateway
- Requires customers to design their own high-availability and DMZ architecture
- Workflow automation is less extensive than commercial MFT platforms
Free, paid support available
5
Files.com
Files.com
Files.com is a cloud-based managed file transfer and file automation platform for businesses handling external and internal file exchange. It combines SFTP,...
Pros
- Broader file-sharing and collaboration features than AWS Transfer Family
- Includes SFTP, automation, integrations, and branded portals
- Simpler administration for teams that do not want to manage AWS infrastructure
Cons
- More expensive than basic self-hosted SFTP deployments
- Less native alignment with AWS storage and IAM
- Some advanced capabilities require higher-tier plans
From $50/month
6
AWS Transfer Family
Amazon Web Services
AWS Transfer Family provides managed SFTP, FTPS, and FTP endpoints backed by Amazon S3 or Amazon EFS. It is designed for organizations...
Pros
- Direct integration with S3 and EFS at AWS scale
- Supports SFTP, FTPS, and FTP protocols
- Strong IAM, logging, networking, and security controls
Cons
- More complex to configure and operate than Couchdrop
- Usage-based billing is harder to predict
- Requires AWS expertise for networking and access policies
Pay-as-you-go; endpoint and data-transfer fees apply
How good are these alternatives?
Your feedback helps us improve the AI rankings.
✅ Thanks for your feedback!
Know a better alternative? 🙌
Suggest a product and our AI will verify it's a real alternative to SFTP To Go before adding it to the list.