Best Moralis Alternatives ranked by AI · updated Aug 2026

✅ Update queued — the AI is re-ranking this list. The page will refresh shortly.

This page is already up to date.

Moralis provides APIs, SDKs, and infrastructure for building applications that read blockchain data and interact with Web3 assets. It is aimed at developers who need normalized multichain data alongside smart-contract and wallet integrations.

Developer: Moralis Price: Free tier; paid plans from $49/mo 🎯 moralis.io

🛠️ Developer Tools 🔗 Blockchain Smart Contracts Ethereum 🌐 Web3

Top 6 Moralis alternatives

Crypto APIs

Crypto APIs provides REST and WebSocket APIs for accessing blockchain data, wallet information, transactions, market data, and NFT activity. It is aimed...

Pros

Offers normalized REST APIs across multiple blockchain networks
Covers wallet, transaction, market, NFT, and blockchain data use cases
Provides webhooks and real-time notifications for application workflows

Cons

Less suitable than node providers for direct RPC customization
Coverage and feature depth vary by blockchain network
Usage limits can become restrictive for high-volume applications

Freemium, paid plans from $49/mo

Alternatives to Crypto APIs → Visit site

PARSIQ

Parsiq

PARSIQ is a blockchain data monitoring and automation platform for developers, trading teams, and Web3 businesses. It provides real-time blockchain event tracking,...

Pros

Combines blockchain monitoring with trigger-based workflow automation
Supports real-time event detection across multiple blockchain networks
Useful for building alerts, trading tools, and operational integrations

Cons

Smaller ecosystem and lower brand awareness than Alchemy or QuickNode
Pricing and product packaging can be less transparent than major API providers
Requires blockchain and event-model knowledge for advanced workflows

Freemium, paid plans vary

Alternatives to PARSIQ → Visit site

Chainstack

Chainstack provides managed blockchain nodes, RPC endpoints, and data access across public and enterprise networks. It serves developers and infrastructure teams that...

Pros

Supports many networks through a consistent management interface
Offers more deployment control than many API-only providers
Useful for teams operating dedicated or archive nodes

Cons

Requires more infrastructure knowledge than Anyblock's analytics tools
Historical analytics and normalization are less central to the product
Interface and billing can be complex for occasional users

Free developer plan; usage-based paid plans

Alternatives to Chainstack → Visit site

NFTPort

NFTPort was a developer platform for NFT data, minting, and blockchain infrastructure APIs. It targeted teams building NFT marketplaces, wallets, games, and...

Pros

Provided NFT metadata, ownership, sales, and collection APIs
Supported NFT minting and asset management through developer APIs
Abstracted blockchain infrastructure for teams without their own indexing stack

Cons

Current service availability and pricing are unclear
Smaller ecosystem than Alchemy, Moralis, or QuickNode
Less suitable than open protocols for teams requiring self-hosted infrastructure

N/A

Alternatives to NFTPort → Visit site

thirdweb

thirdweb is a development platform for building, deploying, and managing Web3 applications and smart contracts. It targets developers and teams that want...

Pros

Broader SDK, contract, and dashboard ecosystem than Bunzz
Strong support for rapid deployment of common Web3 features
Better documentation and developer adoption than Bunzz

Cons

Greater reliance on thirdweb abstractions than a custom Solidity workflow
Advanced usage can become more expensive at scale
Some features vary by supported chain and product tier

Free tier; paid usage-based plans

Alternatives to thirdweb → Visit site

Bunzz

Bunzz Pte. Ltd.

Bunzz is a Web3 development platform that helps developers deploy, manage, and integrate smart contracts across supported blockchain networks. It provides reusable...