Best SimpleHash Alternatives ranked by AI · updated Aug 2026

SimpleHash provides APIs for indexing and retrieving NFT data across multiple blockchains. It is designed for developers building wallets, marketplaces, galleries, analytics tools, and other Web3 applications, with normalized metadata, ownership, collection, and marketplace data.

Developer: SimpleHash Price: Freemium, paid plans from $49/mo 🎯 simplehash.com

🛠️ Developer Tools 🔗 Blockchain 🌐 Web3 nft api

Top 6 SimpleHash alternatives

Alchemy

💡 Pick it for broader blockchain infrastructure, stronger tooling, and production-grade RPC alongside NFT APIs.

Alchemy provides blockchain developer tools and infrastructure, including reliable access to Ethereum.

Pros

Developer tools
Reliable Ethereum access

Cons

Limited network support

Free tier available, paid plans start at $25/month

Alternatives to Alchemy →

Moralis

💡 Choose it when NFTs are part of a broader wallet, token, portfolio, or authentication application.

Moralis provides APIs, SDKs, and infrastructure for building applications that read blockchain data and interact with Web3 assets. It is aimed at...

Pros

More extensive blockchain data APIs than Bunzz
Useful for token, NFT, wallet, and transaction-based applications
Simplifies multichain backend development

Cons

More data-infrastructure focused than smart-contract module development
Usage limits and costs can rise with API volume
Less suitable for teams wanting a fully self-managed toolchain

Free tier; paid plans from $49/mo

Alternatives to Moralis → Visit site

Reservoir

💡 Pick it for NFT marketplace aggregation, trading flows, and more control through open-source components.

Reservoir provides NFT indexing, trading, and marketplace APIs for applications across multiple chains. It is designed for marketplaces, aggregators, wallets, and games...

Pros

Excellent marketplace and orderbook coverage for NFT applications
Open-source components provide more control than a closed API alone
Normalizes listings, bids, sales, and collection data across marketplaces

Cons

More marketplace-centric than NFTPort's broader infrastructure scope
Integration is more complex than using a simple metadata endpoint
Coverage and behavior can vary by chain and marketplace

Free for public API access; custom plans available

Alternatives to Reservoir → Visit site

QuickNode

💡 Choose it when NFT data must sit alongside dependable multi-chain RPC and infrastructure services.

QuickNode offers dedicated and shared Ethereum nodes for developers, providing scalable infrastructure.

Pros

Dedicated nodes
Scalable infrastructure

Cons

Limited to Ethereum network

Free tier available, paid plans start at $9/month

Alternatives to QuickNode →

NFTScan

💡 Pick it for detailed NFT transfer, sales, ownership, and explorer-style indexing data.

NFTScan provides multichain NFT indexing APIs, explorer tools, and collection and wallet data. It is aimed at developers building NFT analytics, portfolio...

Pros

More focused on NFT indexing than general-purpose RPC providers
Offers collection, transfer, ownership, and marketplace-oriented endpoints
Useful multichain coverage for analytics and discovery applications

Cons

Smaller developer ecosystem than Alchemy or QuickNode
Less comprehensive smart-contract and wallet tooling than thirdweb
Documentation and support depth may vary by chain

Freemium, paid API plans

Alternatives to NFTScan → Visit site

Tatum

💡 Choose it when NFT features must share APIs for wallets, tokenization, payments, and blockchain transactions.

Tatum is a multi-chain blockchain development platform with APIs for wallets, transactions, token operations, and payments. It targets developers and businesses building...